PPP Journey - India
Evolution of PPP Water Sector
Deprecated: Elementor\Scheme_Color is deprecated since version 2.8.0! Use Elementor\Core\Schemes\Color instead. in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5401
Deprecated: Elementor\Scheme_Typography is deprecated since version 2.8.0! Use Elementor\Core\Schemes\Typography instead. in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5401
-
1990's
Bangalore bulk water supply project
Hyderabad bulk water
Pune distribution, treatment, bulk water
Goa bulk water
Early initiative on PPP (failed)
High tariff
Political opposition
Credit quality
Lack of project preparation
-
2000
Not many initiatives due to earlier failure
Sangli distribution, treatment and bulk water
Sonia Vihar distribution
Bangalore O&M and collection
-
2005
Failed projects:
- BWSSB project
- DJB Pilot circle
- Mumbai K East
Efforts to restart PPP (opposition by NGO) stalled many projects
-
~ 2010
Few projects took off after Government and multilateral push
Chandrapur - distribution and bulk water - Gurukripa
Latur - Hydro comp
KUWASIP - Veolia
Nagpur - Pilot project - Veolia
Salt lake Kolkata - JUSCO
Haldia - JUSCO
Chennai desalination - IVRCL/Befesa
Bhiwandi bulk water - SPML
-
2015
Earlier projects were mostly focused towards water. Government initiated PPP in wastewater through HAM
Namami Gange
- Varanasi STP
- Haridwar STP
- Mathura
- Kanpur
- Prayagraj
- Kolkata
Key Highlights
- Failure not because of drawbacks of PPP per se but because of drawbacks of the processes that were followed or because of the lack of enablers being in place
- In India, private participation is required in order to build the infrastructure in addition to the improving the efficiency of the project
- PPP has evolved over the years and reached the stage where successful projects are implemented
- India runs fiscal deficit of 3.3% of GDP, which necessitates private investment
Following points are to be noted:
- Earlier projects were focused towards water supply
- The major players such as IVRCL, JUSCO, SPML, etc. are facing financial troubles
- Lack of understanding about the project and underpriced quote resulted in the financial failure of the companies
- Bids for Namami Gange saw participation from technically sound companies, however with little past experience in project development. This was mainly due to strategic importance of the project and well-structured contracts (IFC assisted) with sovereign guarantee
- Recently, National Green Tribunal directed urban bodies to ensure treatment of sewage before discharge by March 2021. Massive investment is expected, part of it will be funded by Private companies through HAM model
Governmental Fund Allocation How It Will Be Released Now
Clean India Mission - Funding Pattern and Benefits
- Govt of India: ₹ 14,623 Crore
- Ministry of Urban Development: ₹62,000 Crore
- State Governments: 25% (10% North Eastern States)
Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation:
₹ 1,34,000 Crore
- PPP
- Collection of User Charges
- Swach Bharat Kosh
- Corporate CSR Funding
Announced Plans for use of Funds
- ₹ 4,000 each for 1.04 Crore urban households – Total Cost : ₹ 4,165 Crores
- ₹ 619 Crores for 2.5 lakh public toilets (rural & urban)
- ₹ 1,000 Crore for awareness creation
- ₹ 15,000 per rural households without sanitation facilities
- ₹ 54,000 per rural school without sanitation facilities
- ₹ 20,000 Anganwadi toilets
- ₹ 6 lakhs for community sanitation complexes
Investment Envisaged Under Smart City Mission
Break up of Projects in Phase 1 of 20 Cities
Investment on Infrastructure in Million USD
